|
PROTEIN
RESIDUE COLLECTION MANUAL
Paleo Research Institute
2675 Youngfield St.
Golden, Colorado 80401
(303) 277-9848
January 2000
COLLECTION OF FIELD SPECIMENS
Flaked Lithics
All flaked lithic specimens should be placed directly into ziplock/whirl-pak
bags with minimal handling.
Please do not spit, lick, or rub on the artifacts as this may result in
positive results for human proteins.
Label the outside of the bag and if desired, place a second label inside
the bag.
Control Samples
Since false positives may result from bacteria, animal feces, lippoproteins,
and alkaline substances
in the soil, it is necessary to test soil samples with the artifacts.
Collect approximately 1 gram samples
from soil surrounding the artifacts and place in suitable containers (film
canisters work nicely).
Other control samples:
Stratified sites: Collect 1 gram samples from all
cultural levels andfrom at least one,
but no more thanthree, off-site areas.
Surface sites: Collect 1 or 2 one gram samples from
the site as well
as 1 sample from off-site.
Control samples will be processed at our discretion and at no additional
cost.
Groundstone and Pecked Stone
This category includes manos, mortars, pestles, etc. We prefer that groundstone
and pecked
stone artifacts be sent to our laboratory for extraction, especially if
pollen and/or phytolith
analyses are also requested. We will collect a protein residue sample
from one side or area
of the groundstone and pollen/starch and/or phytolith samples from a separate
area of the
ground surface. Starch granules represent starchy foods such as seeds
and roots/tubers
that often are ground in preparation for cooking.
Extracts for protein residue analysis from large metates or bedrock mortars
should be
collected by the archaeologist in the lab or field using the methods on
page 4.
Ceramics
Ceramics can also be tested for protein residue, pollen, starch, and/or
phytoliths.
Whole pots or sherds can be sent for analysis and will be treated in a
similar manner
as groundstone. Protein residue analysis cannot be used on carbonized
materials as
the protein proteins are too severely denatured to yield results. Ceramics
containing visible
residue are excellent candidates for phytolith analysis using a new technique
that can
distinguish phytoliths of wild grasses from those of Zea mays and also
can identify
variety of maize.
Soils
Soils from suspected processing areas and/or kill sites frequently retain
the blood
of the animal(s) processed. These soils can also be tested. Small (1 gram)
amounts
of the soil(s) to be tested should be placed in a ziplock/whirl-pak bag
or clean film
canister and sent for analysis.
Curated Artifacts
Curated artifacts are also possible candidates for protein residue analysis.
If the
curated artifacts are stored in trays, they should be placed in separate,
labeled
ziplock/whirl-pak bags. If these artifacts are stored in other types of
bags, such as
brown paper, please send them in "as is."
ARTIFACT SELECTION/RESEARCH QUESTIONS
For very large collections of lithics, selection of artifacts sent
for protein residue analysis
should fit the research design. Some examples:
Finished tools, projectile points with impact fractures,
flakes with
obvious use/wear.
Specific classes of artifacts. For example, were
projectile points
of one class used on a single type of animal -- large points for large
game, small points for small animals?
If artifacts were multi-purpose tools, it is sometimes possible to identify
more than one
type of protein residue, unless the animals are closely related such as
sheep and goats,
or deer and elk.
Different types of protein residue may be detected from the hafting area
and from the tip
of the same tool. Identification of proteins from the hafting area may
identify the hafting
medium. When sending artifacts for hafting area AND tip analysis, please
indicate that
each area is to be tested separately. These areas are considered to be
two separate
samples and will be charged as two samples.
Protein residue analysis can be used in evaluating different aspects
of prehistory.
Examples in which it may be of benefit are:
1. As an objective test of tool function
2. As a test to determine whether animals represented in faunal remains
were
processed at the site.
3. To determine a possible range of animal resources exploited.
Reports
Our reports are interpretive, rather than providing just a list of positive
reactions.
We identify possible animals represented by positive results based on
known
distributions of the animals and known and tested reactions of the antisera.
Artifacts sent for analysis can be tested against the following antisera:
|
Bear |
Deer |
Pig |
American eel |
Trout |
Agave (includes
yucca & aloe) |
|
Bison |
Dog |
Rabbit |
Atlantic croaker |
White perch |
Acorn
|
|
Bovine |
Goat |
Rat |
Bay anchovy |
|
|
|
Camel |
Guinea pig |
Sheep |
Catfish |
|
|
|
Cat |
Horse |
Turkey |
Gizzard shad |
|
|
|
Chicken |
Human |
Elephant(mammoth) |
Striped bass |
|
|
Protein residue analysis has been successfully applied to archaeological
materials
from a variety of areas including Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho,
Montana,
Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Texas.
COLLECTING PROTEIN RESIDUE SAMPLES FROM GROUNDSTONE
Extraction of protein residues is usually performed with a 0.2 M Tris
hydrochloride,
0.5 M sodium chloride, and 0.5 % Triton X-100 solution (most desirable),
although
a 5 % ammonium hydroxide solution (less desirable) also can be used. The
components
for these solutions can be purchased from Fisher Scientific and from Sigma
Chemical
Company. When washing groundstone, use as little solution as possible
(1-5 mL).
For an additional $10.00 charge, we can use a Centriprep-10 centrifugal
concentrator
with a 10,000 molecular weight cut-off membrane. This allows us to concentrate
the
proteins in a large volume of liquid down to a sample about 1-2 mL in
size. If you opt
to use the Centriprep device, a larger volume of solution may be used
to wash the
artifact (up to 50 mL).
Using a sterile (new) toothbrush, vigorously scrub the surface of the
groundstone where
a small amount of solution was applied. Decant the liquid using a pipette
or syringe and
repeat until a small area of the ground surface has been cleaned. Use
additional solution
from the pipette or syringe to "wash" the bristles of the toothbrush to
get the residue out of it
The decanted solution should be placed in a clean (preferably new) screw-capped
plastic
container with a tight seal. This container should be placed in a labelled
ziplock/whirl-pak bag.
If you have groundstone that was buried in the soil, be sure to scrape
off the excess soil and
include a soil control from the same area as the groundstone (preferably
not what was
scraped off the tool). Soils commonly contain compounds such as bacteria,
lippoproteins,
and animal feces that can cause false positive results for buried artifacts.
A 1-2 gram soil
control size is all that is required, and these soil controls are run
at no extra charge.
DO THIS PROCEDURE FIRST, BEFORE WASHING THE REMAINDER OF THE SURFACE
FOR POLLEN/PHYTOLITHS/STARCH.
DO NOT USE GLASS CONTAINERS FOR STORING PROTEIN RESIDUES, AS THE
PROTEIN WILL ADHERE TO THE GLASS, MAKING RECOVERY DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE.
GUIDELINES FOR FIELD COLLECTION OF
ARTIFACTS FOR PROTEIN RESIDUE ANALYSIS
In the Field:
1. Handle the artifact as little as possible.
Use trowel to pick up and place in plastic bag
Use powderless latex gloves (other gloves are less
effective) (NOTE: any latex or
non-latex gloves might contain starch. DO NOT USE if you want Starch Analysis
unless
you have had the brand of gloves tested for starch.)
2. Do not brush off or clean dirt adhering to artifact
3. Place artifact in clean plastic bag
4. In a separate plastic bag or clean film canister,
add a small amount of adjacent dirt
Dirt will be used as a negative control
Dirt should be from under the artifact unless the
artifact is in an area suspected to have
been filled with blood, guts, and gore.
Dirt should not have touched the artifact in situ
In the Lab:
1. Know the laboratory where analysis is being performed
Do they understand the methods to be used?
What are their handling and extraction methods?
Do they understand the antisera used for analysis?
How will results be reported?
Updated 01-09-06
|